Skip to content


Harry Cassin
Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding
Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman
Senior Editor

Bill Steinman
Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin
Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn
Editor Emeritus

Cody Worthington
Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro
Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox
Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn
Contributing Editor

Bill Waite
Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah
Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets
Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong
Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson
Contributing Editor

U.S. Bank Regulators: Hemp growers aren’t always ‘suspicious’

Four federal agencies and state bank regulators said Tuesday that banks are no longer required to file suspicious activity reports for customers solely because they’re growing and cultivating hemp.

The statement was issued by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FinCEN, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors.

It clarified the legal status of hemp growth and production and requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act for banks providing services to hemp-related businesses.

Banks are no longer required to file suspicious activity reports (SARs) for customers solely because they’re engaged in the growth or cultivation of hemp “in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.” But banks are still required to follow standard SAR procedures “if indicia of suspicious activity warrants,” the statement said.

Under current federal rules, hemp can now be grown with a valid USDA-issued license or under a USDA-approved state or tribal plan.

The 2018 Farm Bill signed by President Trump removed hemp from the controlled substance list.

States themselves can still outlaw hemp growing, according to Tuesday’s statement.

Marijuana (as opposed to hemp) remains a controlled substance under federal law. The Controlled Substances Act makes it illegal to manufacture, distribute, or dispense marijuana.

Share this post


Comments are closed for this article!