Skip to content

Editors

Harry Cassin
Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding
Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman
Senior Editor

Bill Steinman
Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin
Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn
Editor Emeritus

Cody Worthington
Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro
Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox
Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn
Contributing Editor

Bill Waite
Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah
Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets
Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong
Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson
Contributing Editor

Does e-government reduce corruption? Take the survey

Do e-government and digital technologies really help to prevent corruption? Companies appear to believe that they do — but what’s your view?

E-government such as e-procurement, e-customs, e-tax filing and e-sourcing aim to promote efficient and clean business. It is said that reducing personal contacts between companies and government officials helps to reduce the scope for discretionary decisions, diminishing the opportunities for bribery.

Initial results and comments received from companies participating in the Basel Institute on Governance’s survey (participate here) on the effectiveness e-government tools to prevent corruption reveal a variety of views — some say they actively consider whether they are available when entering a new market, others cite corruption prevention as being the number one reason for companies to use such tools.

Some firms are more prosaic and indicate that business reasons such as reducing transaction time and costs are why they prefer e-government.

The effectiveness of e-procurement is less clear cut  as such tools are not only identified as being particularly helpful to curb corruption, but also as a means that might inadvertently enable bribery.

But what’s your view? Is your experience with e-government a different story, or reflective of some of the preliminary findings?

A more representative sample would improve the results of the survey, so spare us a few minutes of your time by participating in the short, anonymous survey here.

Thank you!  

_____

Scarlet Wannenwetsch is a Project Associate at the International Centre for Collective Action at the Basel Institute on Governance, she holds law degrees from London University and the Free University of Berlin.

Share this post

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter

2 Comments

  1. Electronic tools mentioned in this article may help to streamline some aspects of an international transaction.However, it's the personal relationships between parties (ie.agent & Gov't official) that drive the transaction. In high-risk jurisdictions this reality plays out even more so, as technology has not been implemented or embraced to the extent that it will suppress or prevent corruption. Training and investment in on-the-ground investigation of the contracting parties are trusted methods that bring clarity to such transactions. Experienced locals sources are the key.

  2. THE COMPENSATORY CORRUPTION LAW: For every new and effective means of reducing corruption there is immediately developed an equally effective compensatory means of increasing it.


Comments are closed for this article!