Skip to content


Harry Cassin
Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding
Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman
Senior Editor

Bill Steinman
Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin
Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn
Editor Emeritus

Cody Worthington
Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro
Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox
Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn
Contributing Editor

Bill Waite
Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah
Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets
Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong
Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson
Contributing Editor

Sundar Narayanan: Is your next compliance problem at a toll booth in Delhi?

Delhi recently started enforcing new traffic regulations to reduce pollution levels. In October 2015, the city — properly the National Capital Territory, where 10 million people live — imposed a Green Tax on vehicles. 

The Green Tax (formally known as an Economic Compensation Charge) is supposed to be collected by the toll collection agencies at 124 entry points to Delhi.

In May last year, a the toll collection contract was awarded through a tender process to SMYC Consortium (a consortium of select contractors). After some delay, at the instruction of Supreme Court of India, the contractor started collecting Green Tax in November 2015.

India Today, a respected new agency, reported the outcome of a sting operation that allegedly showed the toll collection agency allowing vehicles into Delhi at a fixed fee but without issuing receipts across multiple points of entry.

If the India Today was accurate, what implications could there be for multinational companies subject to the Green Tax or other aspects of the toll collection process?

Toll booth centers in India are traditional areas of bribe risk, raising red flags at the start for compliant organizations.

Usually, MNCs would come into contact with the toll booths indirectly — that is, through transport and logistics contractors hired to move goods overland in India.

The country’s private transportation and logistics sector is still largely unorganized and hasn’t matured enough to show any real levels of antibribery compliance. There is still in India a limited history of bribe prosecution of private individuals and entities, as well as a lack of available basic information about such transporters and their reputations. So desktop or subscribed database-based due diligence tools used by large multinationals may be unproductive.

In most cases the individual bribe payments at toll booths are small amounts. But because corrupt payments are primarily to avoid taxes (tolls), the payments probably won’t fall under the definition of facilitation payments under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and wouldn’t be legally excused.

Further, contractors involved in toll collections in India act as a functionaries of the government, likely bringing them within the definition of “foreign officials.” So corrupt payments to them could be prohibited by the U.S. law.

That’s my legalistic view of the situation. But we should also take a wider view.

The people who live in Delhi are all hurt by the air pollution. And compliance failures at the toll booths will add to the pollution.


Sundar Narayanan is a forensic accountant from India. He currently leads the forensic services of SKP Business Consulting LLP. He can be reached at [email protected].

Share this post


1 Comment

  1. Yeah .. I agree With you. Now a days, Delhi is becoming one of the most polluted city in India which is the capital of city. In my point of view, instead of taking action on toll booth's they may take necessary action on the vehicle's running inside the Delhi. This is because if we try to control the traffic and vehicle rate inside the city (without affecting the regular work) we may have a chance to decrease the pollution rate. This is not a perfect solution but it give the some remedy.. Nice Article Sir.

Comments are closed for this article!