Skip to content


Harry Cassin
Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding
Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman
Senior Editor

Bill Steinman
Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin
Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn
Editor Emeritus

Cody Worthington
Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro
Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox
Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn
Contributing Editor

Bill Waite
Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah
Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets
Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong
Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson
Contributing Editor

BNP trampled compliance officers, pays record $9 billion penalties for sanction offenses

Paris-based BNP Paribas S.A. was sentenced Friday for processing billions of dollars of transactions through the U.S. financial system on behalf of Sudanese, Iranian and Cuban entities subject to U.S. economic sanctions. 

BNP was ordered to forfeit more than $8.8 billion to the United States and to pay a $140 million fine. The bank was also sentenced to a five-year term of probation.

The $9 billion sentence was “the largest financial penalty ever imposed in a criminal case,” the DOJ said.

BNP is the world’s fourth biggest bank. It pleaded guilty in July 2014 to conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act.

Federal judge Lorna Schofield of the Southern District of New York sentenced the bank Friday.

BNP admitted that from at least 2004 through 2012, it “knowingly and willfully” moved over $8.8 billion through the U.S. financial system on behalf of Sudanese, Iranian, and Cuban sanctioned entities in violation of U.S. economic sanctions. 

About $6.4 billion of the illegal payments were made on behalf of sanctioned entities in Sudan.

In March 2007, a senior compliance officer wrote to other high-level BNP compliance and legal employees that certain customers played “a pivotal part in the support of the Sudanese government which . . . has hosted Osama Bin Laden and refuses the United Nations intervention in Darfur.”

In its guilty plea, BNP also admitted that it continued to do U.S. dollar business with Cuba long after it was clear that such business was illegal. BNP admitted that its conduct with regard to the Cuban embargo was both “cavalier” and “criminal.”

BNP also said it processed more than $650 million of transactions involving entities tied to Iran. Some transactions involved a Dubai-based oil business linked to the Iran government. “This conduct continued into 2012 — nearly two years after the bank had commenced an internal investigation into its sanctions compliance and pledged to cooperate with the government,” the DOJ said.

The DOJ said Friday it is exploring ways to use the forfeited funds to compensate individuals who may have been harmed by the sanctioned regimes of Sudan, Iran and Cuba. 

“As a preliminary step in this process, the Justice Department is inviting such individuals or their representatives to provide information describing the nature and value of the harm they suffered.” 

“Beginning today (May 1, 2015),” the DOJ said, “interested persons can learn more about this process and submit their information at [external link], or call 888-272-5632 (within North America) or 317-324-0382 (internationally).”

In a statement Friday, Leslie Caldwell, chief of the DOJ’s criminal division, explained BNP’s record fine: “BNP Paribas flouted U.S. sanctions laws to an unprecedented extreme, concealed its tracks, and then chose not to fully cooperate with U.S. law enforcement, leading to a criminal guilty plea and nearly $9 billion penalty.”

In 2005, a senior compliance officer at BNP warned: “As I understand it, we have a number of Arab Banks (nine identified) on our books that only carry out clearing transactions for Sudanese banks in dollars. … This practice effectively means that we are circumventing the U.S. embargo on transactions in USD by Sudan.”

In response, a business leader told the compliance officer that the practice had “full support” of management at BNP in Paris.

Later that year, BNP’s compliance staff met with executives to again express, “to the highest level of the bank, the reservations of the Swiss Compliance office concerning the transactions executed with and for Sudanese customers.”

An executive requested no minutes of the meeting be kept and again dismissed the issue.

Thirteen bank executives, including a chief operating officer, were fired as part of the agreement BNP reached in June last year with New York’s Department of Financial Services.

In August last year, BNP announced the retirement of its top compliance officer, Jean Clamon. He was succeeded by Eric Martin, head of internal audit. Clamon had been the chief compliance officer since 2008 and was also a former chief operating officer.


Richard L. Cassin is the publisher and editor of the FCPA Blog. He can be contacted here.

Share this post


1 Comment

  1. The issue is that the judgment only charges the BNP as an organization. None of its officers were charged. It is clear that management of the bank were personally liable and instrumental in the perpetuation of the scheme, with major impact on citizens of Sudan and the other countries noted. Iran has just been reported to be the second ranked in punishment by execution of its citizens, In Sudan, Omar Al Bashir has been indicted by the ICC, Darfur continues to be a troubled zone with killings and raping of refugees still happening, and I can't escape the feeling that there are direct causal links. The DOJ has recognized this in their making available of funds to claimants who have suffered as a result. We should also not forget that the leaders of these troubled countries preside over massive population shifts as a result of their vicious political agendas. The outcome of this country mismanagement is replayed daily on the news, when another boat of refugees capsizes, as well as the anguish we feel in Europe over the loss of life and misery of these people who have nowhere safe to go.

    I think it is time we started prosecuting officers of organizations rather than just the organizations themselves, especially where there is such clear documented evidence of individual malfeasance, as well as such causal evidence to the various social issues we are all paying the price for.


Comments are closed for this article!