Skip to content


Harry Cassin
Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding
Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman
Senior Editor

Bill Steinman
Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin
Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn
Editor Emeritus

Cody Worthington
Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro
Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox
Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn
Contributing Editor

Bill Waite
Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah
Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets
Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong
Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson
Contributing Editor

Book exposes world of anonymous shell companies

In Global Shell Games: Experiments in Transnational Relations, Crime and Terrorism,  Michael Findley and Daniel Nielson show how shell companies are used to commit bribery, circumvent sanctions, launder money and evade taxes.

Posing as 21 different international consultants, the authors approached nearly 4,000 incorporation services in 180 countries to learn how hard or easy it is to form untraceable shell companies.

Remember Ukraine’s former president Viktor Yanukovych? In his opulent estate was a private zoo, vintage car collection, hovercraft and golf course, among other things.

What was less obvious, Findley and Nielson said, was the network of anonymous and untraceable shell companies used to acquire and hide the ownership of the presidential palace. 

Another Ukraine leader, Pavlo Lazarenko, was accused of stealing $200 million during his two years as prime minister. Transparency International once named him the eighth most corrupt world leader in history. He was convicted of money laundering in California in 2006, where he lived in a luxurious estate.

Lazarenko kept some of his money in U.S. shell companies set up by a firm in Cheyenne, Wyoming, the authors said.

Of the replies the authors received to their requests to set up shell companies, almost half never asked for proper, certified proof of identity. Just over a fifth failed to ask for any photo ID at all.

Many of those selling shell companies weren’t concerned about corruption risk. “They were just as willing to sell untraceable companies to our obvious high-risk profiles as to the innocuous, low-risk customers,” the authors said.

A few other findings included:

  • Classic tax havens such as the Cayman Islands do s better job of enforcing corporate transparency rules than richer, more powerful countries.
  • Some of the least compliant incorporation service providers were found in Delaware, Nevada and Wyoming. 
  •  Most shell companies are untraceable because those selling them often don’t need to be licensed to do so.

The authors argue that G20 leaders need to adopt international standards on corporate transparency to limit the use of anonymous shell companies.


Julie DiMauro is the executive editor of FCPA Blog and can be reached here.

Share this post



  1. I wish this article was more revealing and uncovering! Shell and unlisted companies located in Delaware etc are more mysterious and chaotic than many third world operations in Asia.We need to unravel them in the larger interest of Business Growth and robust business models in the Global arena.

  2. I'm mainly interested in the effort to identify and shut down shell corporations that are being used to funnel money to jihadis. While I roundly condemn the looting of Ukraine by all of its former heads of state, the issue of terror funding presents a much greater worldwide security risk. I certainly hope that you can help to root out this problem.

Comments are closed for this article!