Skip to content


Harry Cassin
Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding
Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman
Senior Editor

Bill Steinman
Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin
Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn
Editor Emeritus

Cody Worthington
Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro
Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox
Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn
Contributing Editor

Bill Waite
Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets
Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong
Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson
Contributing Editor

Deferred prosecution agreements: part of the problem or part of the solution?

Last week, Assistant AG Lanny A. Breuer, left, head of the DOJ’s criminal division, talked about the use and benefits of deferred prosecution agreements in corporate enforcement actions.

Not everyone liked Breuer’s explanation.

But we did.

DPAs don’t stack the deck in favor of the DOJ. Respondeat superior does that.

DPAs instead help the DOJ and corporate defendants move forward to resolve criminal activity by employees and agents that’s attributed to the company.

Respondeat superior is an extreme doctrine. The DOJ didn’t invent it but has to live with it, as do corporate defendants.

So finding ways to soften respondeat superior is a good thing.

Fixing it — through a good-faith defense — would be better.

But until that happens, DPAs look like the best option.

*     *     *

Here’s what Breuer said.

His substantive remarks start at 7:30 on the clip.

Share this post


Comments are closed for this article!