Skip to content


Harry Cassin
Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding
Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman
Senior Editor

Bill Steinman
Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin
Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn
Editor Emeritus

Cody Worthington
Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro
Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox
Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn
Contributing Editor

Bill Waite
Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets
Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong
Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson
Contributing Editor

Revive Jacobson’s Good-Faith Compliance Plan

News in April about Wal-Mart’s bribery embroglio in Mexico killed the debate about FCPA reform. Too bad. Parts of that debate were productive and could have led to some welcome changes.

The best reform idea we heard came from Billy Jacobson, the former assistant chief for FCPA enforcement at the DOJ. Just weeks before the New York Times broke the Wal-Mart story, he proposed a good-faith compliance test. If companies could meet five simple criteria, they would avoid prosecution.

His five elements were: self reporting, clean hands by senior management, cooperation with the government, robust remedial measures, and an in-place compliance program before any violations happened.

Jacobson, now co-general counsel and chief compliance officer at Weatherford International Ltd., said the DOJ could adopt his proposal as part of its enforcement practices. That way, Congressional action — always a tough proposition — wouldn’t be needed. (The DOJ may already be reforming some aspects of enforcement, according to a post this month by Mike Koehler.) 

What do we like about Jacobson’s idea? It encourages companies to have strong compliance programs. It protects them against rogue employees. And it keeps those rogue employees on the hook for prosecution.

That’s a nice balance of carrots and sticks.

The Wal-Mart shock is wearing off. It’s time to revive this part of the FCPA reform debate.

Share this post


Comments are closed for this article!