Skip to content

Editors

Harry Cassin
Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding
Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman
Senior Editor

Bill Steinman
Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin
Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn
Editor Emeritus

Cody Worthington
Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro
Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox
Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn
Contributing Editor

Bill Waite
Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah
Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets
Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong
Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson
Contributing Editor

To Mexico, from Nigeria, via Kazakhstan: On the Trail of a Great Idea (Part 1)

 Yesterday, Benjamin Kessler wrote a stirring defense of what he called “one of the most altruistic FCPA amendments yet proposed:” adopting a system to share the proceeds of FCPA settlements with the victims of bribery. The idea comes from Nigeria’s Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project.

The post brought me back to a conversation I had a few years ago, while conducting anti-bribery research in India.

Sitting in an upscale Mumbai cafe, across from the Indian partner of a Big Four accounting firm, I could see through the window evidence of both new wealth and chronic poverty. That’s Mumbai. We were talking about the FCPA.

“So,” she said, “the U.S. is finally prosecuting companies for paying bribes in countries like India.”

“Yes,” I said, “it most certainly is.”

“And the DOJ will come in, find evidence of bribery, and slap the company with heavy fines.”

“Indeed,” said I. “The fines can reach in the hundreds of millions of dollars.”

She asked, “So where does that money go?”

“Straight to the U.S. Treasury.”  

“Who does that help?” she said.

I had no idea what to say. 

I have rehashed that conversation dozens of times since. Maybe I should have said something about general deterrence? But it would have seemed to that accountant a useless abstraction. It sometimes seems that way to me. Can we not come up with something better? Something more specific, more direct?

Maybe we can. Maybe SERAP just did. And maybe it’s not unprecedented, even in the FCPA context. We’ll explore this idea — its past, its present, and its future — in subsequent posts. 
__________________

Andy Spalding is a contributing editor of the FCPA Blog. He teaches international business law at the Chicago-Kent College of Law. Effective June 1, he’ll be an Assistant Professor at the University of Richmond School of Law.

Share this post

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter

1 Comment

  1. In 2010 the UK's SFO reached a settlement with BAE Systems by which £29.5m out of a total of £30m was to be paid for the benefit of the people of Tanzania. At the same time, the DoJ fined them $400m – apparently for the benefit of the people of the USA


Comments are closed for this article!