Skip to content


Harry Cassin
Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding
Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman
Senior Editor

Bill Steinman
Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin
Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn
Editor Emeritus

Cody Worthington
Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro
Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox
Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn
Contributing Editor

Bill Waite
Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah
Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets
Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong
Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson
Contributing Editor

Good News: Compliance Cuts Fraud

Let’s take a breather from doom and gloom. The FCPA and other similar legislation do have a silver lining.

In the process of assuring FCPA and U.K. Bribery Act compliance, organizations are also combating fraud. The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners estimates that the average organization loses about 5% of annual revenues to fraud – a potential fraud loss of more than $2.9 trillion of the estimated 2009 Gross World Product. How much might that translate to for your organization?

And FCPA and U.K. Bribery Act compliance testing comes with some other pretty big standard business benefits. Tests for bribery risks can also double up to identify other risks in the Purchase-to-Pay, Travel & Entertainment, Procurement Cards, Payroll, and General Ledger areas – if the tests are correctly configured. Not too bad for a side effect.

Here are some other examples of where FCPA and U.K. Bribery Act compliance overlaps with other business risks:

                                       Click on the image to enlarge


Steve Biskie, CPA, CITP, CISA, is the Director of Customer Solutions, ACL Services.

ACL Services is a sponsor of the FCPA Blog.

Share this post


Comments are closed for this article!